The principles of the medias positive influence and the benefits of the media

Mergers[ edit ] Media mergers are a result of one media related company buying another company for control of their resources in order to increase revenues and viewership.

The principles of the medias positive influence and the benefits of the media

She finds that no country in the analysis scores very highly on both of these dimensions, but that the variations between states match differences in the quality of their democracy.

Modern societies could not be imagined without mass communication.

BibMe: Free Bibliography & Citation Maker - MLA, APA, Chicago, Harvard

Television, newspapers, the radio and the internet are the main sources of information for citizens all around the globe. But what does this mean for the functioning of political systems and processes?

The principles of the medias positive influence and the benefits of the media

Few would doubt that mass media in authoritarian regimes — which are typically controlled tightly by the state — serve to maintain the existing power structure. By contrast, there is a great deal of controversy when it comes to the issue of whether free mass media serve or harm democracy once it has been established.

This is alleged to have serious repercussions for democracy, causing apathy, cynicism and ignorance with regard to politics among citizens.

Most notably, there is a lack of research on democratic media performance and its effects on democratic outcomes across a wide range of countries and by means of a comprehensive theoretical framework and systematic multivariate analysis.

Judgments 2014

A large part of my research therefore deals with the question of how democratic media performance can be assessed in a comparative perspective. To this end, a theoretical model of media performance is developed and found to be empirically valid.

It is defined by two normative functions that mass media should fulfil in a democracy. Based on this two-dimensional concept, I identify indicators to measure media performance on two different levels of analysis: While the structural analysis comprises media market statistics for 47 countries — including most of Europe — from tothe content level focuses on data from a content analysis of 50 newspapers from ten countries during the year How does media performance differ across countries?

The comparison of democratic media performance reveals a considerable variation across the 10 to 47 countries examined, and different patterns can be identified.

Although some countries may be ascribed a higher overall degree of media performance than others, none of them score particularly highly on both the vertical and the horizontal functions. It therefore seems that optimising both media functions at the same time is only feasible up to a certain point.

Countries either perform badly or moderately on both functions, or outstandingly on just one of the functions. In a nutshell, while the younger democracies within the sample generally lag behind especially the Eastern European, Asian and Latin American cases, but also some Southern European countriesdifferent patterns of media performance can be observed with respect to the more mature democracies.

The vertical function — the degree to which media provide political information — seems to be best guaranteed in Anglo-Saxon and Scandinavian countries as well as in Japan.

This includes the United States, often considered a worst case in terms of media performance.

The principles of the medias positive influence and the benefits of the media

In contrast, the horizontal function — the capacity for the media to act as a representative public forum — is found to be much stronger in central-western European countries, such as Austria, Germany and Switzerland. These patterns are observed with regard to both the structural and the content level.

The systemic conditions that media outlets operate in also appear to influence their news coverage. Does media quality actually affect the quality of democracy?The Existence of Social Issue in - Throughout the years of , many countries faced social unjust through political and economic issues that were brought on by the industrialization of .

Positive effects of the media 1. Ahn Suha 2. Mass media has given each of us a platform to voice our opinions on all sorts of social and political issues and share information with one another. It has brought out easy ways of communication and provided us with easily accessible means to reach out to people in various parts of the world.

How Does the Media Influence People? | lausannecongress2018.com

Saturday August 17 11am pm, pm, pm and pm. Daphne MCormack - Learn tips and tricks to collage your ATC as well as special techniques using transfers. In ethics, value denotes the degree of importance of some thing or action, with the aim of determining what actions are best to do or what way is best to live (normative ethics), or to describe the significance of different lausannecongress2018.com systems are proscriptive and prescriptive beliefs, they affect ethical behavior of a person or are the basis of their intentional activities.

JEWS MANIPULATE OUR MINDS through their control of mainstream American Media. And these Jews are on a fierce campaign to eradicate any semblance of Christianity in America.

Here Is A List Of The Jews Who Own The Major Media In The US: Murray Rothstein: AKA “Sumner Redstone.” Owner of . The media has both positive and negative influences on people.

The media can make a person more aware of what is happening on a local, national and global level, or it can warp one’s perspective of the truth. The media has the capacity to ruin society by encouraging false ideals, praising.

Concentration of media ownership - Wikipedia